Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Casper's avatar

Read through this and see some of the hallmarks of what I assume are LLM contributions. Whether or not it's digestible to read, I would prefer to take my sub money elsewhere in favor of writers who are writing their articles/substack themselves (without AI at any stage). Can LLMs write journalistically? Probably, sure. Do I want to support that with my money? Not even remotely.

Judith Hofeditz's avatar

It's a lot. I think too much. It feels plagiaristic even though sources are cited. One of my family members is experimenting with using AI for digesting and summarizing scientifically based content that is hard to get to with simple searches, and feels it's a great timesaver, but almost all of this content I have actually seen in many other news publications so it feels like just a laundry list of today's news. If you aren't going to do original reporting then it works OK as long as sources are cited, but I agree with Casper that it's not what I thought I signed up for.

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?